DJ Lucas wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote: > >> No patches. Bad testing. I built glibc 3 times last night, but I guess >> I did not test that one with a full rebuild. >> >> > Okay... Yes I did, but I applied the patch before running the existing > script. Also, glibc was installed already. I don't think the > iconv-test fix is entirely correct. It did not work this time, maybe it > passed because glibc was already installed? Starting a new build of > glibc (with one installed). Greg, when you get time, can you confirm > that the copy does fix the testsuite immediately after the temp tools > phase on DIY? If so, then I have no idea why this did not work. > > Okay...I don't know what the heck happened. Sorry I took so long. I had a bunch of test suite errors after rebuilding glibc - nptl, math errors, iconv errors. Very strange. I got ticked off and started from the start of chapter6 again and then I had to do ball joints on my truck. Hopefully I just had a typo someplace that had a really bad effect. I'll let you know soon...I want it all tested. Looks like both patches are required, but after the mess I had today, I'm verifying one additional time. I just installed man-pages...starting glibc once again. Let you know in about an hour and twenty.
-- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
