Randy McMurchy wrote: > Hi all, > > Noted in the DJ build that he's commented out (removed?) the > instructions to build just a partial set of the locales to > satisfy the tests of Glibc and other packages later on. > > I'm going to commit what DJ has (the partial locale list > omitted). If it is determined that we want what was originally > there (partial list or locales to satisfy test suites), then > we'll simply uncomment the original text. > > Sound Okay? > Actually, the individual locales are not needed any longer. Investigating some odd test failures, I found this by accident, but it was right there in Greg's reference build:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2004-11/msg00105.html Seems the following list of locales will be used if available: de_DE ISO-8859-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15 en_HK ISO-8859-1 en_PH ISO-8859-1 en_US ISO-8859-1 en_US.ISO-8859-1 ISO-8859-1 en_US.ISO-8859-15 ISO-8859-15 en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8 es_ES ISO-8859-1 es_MX ISO-8859-1 fr_FR ISO-8859-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15 is_IS UTF-8 it_IT ISO-8859-1 ja_JP.eucjp EUC-JP se_NO.UTF-8 UTF-8 ta_IN UTF-8 zh_TW BIG5 http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/bk01pt01ch02.html#manual.intro.setup.prereq -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
