DJ Lucas wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote: >> <para>This package does come with a test suite, however, it cannot be >> run at this time because we do not have a C++ compiler yet.<para> >> > Actually, I've never seen any discussion on this, but I believe that it > was suggested to be more "personal" in one of the bugs opened by Gerard > IIRC. "we" is good in that case, but again, I've never seen any > discussion on it.
Well, you know how I feel about using "we" in a technical manual. :-) But this is LFS and not BLFS and "we" has been part of the deal since the beginning. I remember Ken M. saying he liked it as it shows a bit of "personalizing". However, as much as it pains me to say it, I don't hold Gerard's technical input in this project to a very high degree any longer anyway. I don't mean that badly. I'm only saying he hasn't contributed anything technically significant for many, many years. However, I do still look at him as the project founder. And for that alone, I hold him in high regard. -- Randy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
