Em Monday 13 October 2008 18:30:56 Gilles Espinasse escreveu: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Valter Douglas Lisbôa Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:05 PM > Subject: Re: Udev Rules > > > > > > Matthew Burgess wrote: > > > > >> I'd prefer to follow upstream and put the Udev supplied default > > rules > > > > > >> in /lib/udev/rules.d. > > > > > > > > > > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > > > I say keep them in /etc. > > > > I'm too. > > Place of rules is not only a matter of taste between /etc and /lib > http://marc.info/?l=linux-hotplug&m=121828444204300&w=2 > > If you place everything on /etc, there is no more a priority at one place > for custom changes. > > > > udev maintainer claim > > > "Most udev rules are not config files, not supposed to be edited, and > > > therefore do not belong into /etc." > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-hotplug&m=121839763301840&w=2 > > > > > > > > > Gilles > > > > Well, than it couldn't be editable by a config file, correct?. At least, > > the "defaults" for the basic devices must to be resonable, and we all > > make ours "udev-configs packages" to create a secure and organized /dev > > because these defaults are somewhat insecure or/and ugly. > > > > I always believe that /lib and /usr/lib are place to store modules, > > libraries, > > > binary data and support programs, not plain configurarion texts. Be it > > for create defaults or not. > > placing rules on /etc is discouraged like editing _default_ rules > http://marc.info/?l=linux-hotplug&m=121846825230235&w=2 I think worse put this type of files in two locations, worse yet if it has the same name.
> > > Gilles -- Valter Douglas Lisbôa Jr. Sócio-Diretor Trenix - IT Solutions "Nossas Idéias, suas Soluções!" www.trenix.com.br [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
