Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Tushar Teredesai wrote: > >> I still don't get it. Does the current LFS leadership get to decide >> what every project that ever "forked" from LFS can and cannot do? > > No, and I don't think it's even being tried. There are some expressions of > regret that there are personality conflicts and a wish by some, including me, > to > get together, but I don't see anyone trying to direct anything.
Well, it's going to take a firm resolve and direction by those taking the lead in the projects. You would have to have some sort of discussion to attempt to bring efforts together. Here's a quick list to try: Gerard (if someone can wake him up...) Matthew Burgess and Bruce Dubbs (representing LFS) Randy McMurchy and DJ Lucas (representing BLFS) Robert Connolly (representing HLFS) George Boudreau (representing ALFS) Jim Gifford, Ryan Oliver and Joe Ciccone (if CLFS is interested, which I think is the hope) And a somewhat 'neutral' party. I would suggest either Ken Moffat or Dan Nicholson, or perhaps both. These two have always (in my opinion) kept to a very balanced view of things. If you want the LiveCD project involved, I would suggest Alexander as a representative. Also, I think the invitation for any initiative should be extended to Greg Schafer representing DIY, if he is interested. I think, if anything is going to happen, this is the crew that's going to have to get together and agree. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
