On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:58:45 -0700, Dan Nicholson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Matthew Burgess > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Given that LFS only installs bash, does any of this matter? :) > > A while back I sanitized the bootscripts for POSIX sh compatibility, > and I think DJ has been maintaining that goal. I think it's a nice > (and obtainable) goal to target since having sh != bash can save on > bloat.
Yes, I agree that's a reasonable objective. So, do we want to move '[' and 'test' to /bin then, just in case the user installs a shell that doesn't include builtins for those utilities? DJ, have you done any sh-compatibility auditing recently? Thanks, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
