On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 06:52:49 -0700, Bryan Kadzban <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 08:55:50PM +0100, Guy Dalziel wrote: >> I don't know how important the difference >> between _most_ compiles and _all_ compiles is, but T_CFLAGS seems to > work >> just as well. > > The point of adding that flag was to create byte-for-byte identical > compiler binaries. Have you verified that hacking on T_CFLAGS (instead > of XCFLAGS) actually does this?
To be honest, Bryan, I only care about the fact that the bootstrapped and non-bootstrapped compilers should be feature/speed compatible, and without that flag they won't be (as -fomit-frame-pointer speeds the compiler up, apparently). If it also makes things byte-for-byte compatible, then all the better. Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
