Matthew Burgess wrote: > Hi, > > As mentioned at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-07/msg00411.html, > GCC-4.4.1 will be announced shortly. > > As such, do we want to squeeze this in to LFS-6.5? > > Regards, > > Matt. > I vote for inclusion. The more stable LFS as a foundation is the better IMHO. Even if we just boiled "stability" down to the tool chain and the kernel I would then still vote for a .1 inclusion to a stable book version.
James -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
