This is a report of the tests I've done on a 3GHz Core2 Duo based system. To run this test, I loaded Ubuntu 9.04 64-bit server and Ubuntu 9.04 32-bit Desktop on separate partitions on the test system. In both cases, I updated to the necessary packages needed in "Host System Requirements" and installed the appropriate symlinks for sh, yacc, and awk. From that point I ran jhalfs on each host distro and reviewed the results. This is a summary.
I think all the test errors are due to underlying problems in the packages and are not due to the LFS methodology. Comments? -- Bruce Metric 32-bit 64-bit SBU 94 seconds 91 seconds Total time 126.7 SBU 125.7 SBU Total Time 198.5 minutes 190.6 minutes (64-bit is 4% faster) Disk space 648.379 MB 709.258 MB (64-bit is 9% larger) Test errors: 32-bit: gcc: 7 failures FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-static) execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O2) execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O3) execution test FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntdq-256-1.c (test for excess errors) WARNING: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntdq-256-1.c compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntpd-256-1.c (test for excess errors) WARNING: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntpd-256-1.c compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntps-256-1.c (test for excess errors) WARNING: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntps-256-1.c compilation failed to produce executable All other packages passed without detecting any errors ====================================================== 64-bit: gcc: 9 failures FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntdq-256-1.c (test for excess errors) WARNING: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntdq-256-1.c compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntpd-256-1.c (test for excess errors) WARNING: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntpd-256-1.c compilation failed to produce executable FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx-vmovntps-256-1.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-static) execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O2) execution test FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O3) execution test coreutils: 1 failure FAIL: cp/cp-mv-enotsup-xattr automake: 1 failure FAIL: acloca22.test gawk: 4 failures FAIL: stackoverflow2 double1 -- ./double1.ok _double1 differ: char 1, line 1 double2 -- ./double2.ok _double2 differ: char 247, line 4 intformat -- ./intformat.ok _intformat differ: char 1, line 1 e2fsprogs: 4 failures d_loaddump: debugfs load/dump test: ../../tests/d_loaddump/script: line 22: 23505 Segmentation fault $DEBUGFS -R "write $TEST_DATA test_data" -w $TMPFILE >> $OUT.new 2>&1 ../../tests/d_loaddump/script: line 34: 23509 Segmentation fault $DEBUGFS -R "dump test_data $VERIFY_DATA" $TMPFILE >> $OUT.new 2>&1 f_dup4: find all directory pathnames: ../../tests/f_dup4/script: line 41: 24241 Segmentation fault $DEBUGFS -w $TMPFILE > /dev/null 2>&1 <<EOF f_imagic_fs: imagic filesystem with imagic inodes: ../../tests/run_e2fsck: line 48: 24950 Segmentation fault $DEBUGFS -w -R "feature imagic_inodes" $TMPFILE > /dev/null 2>&1 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
