Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: > ok thanks for this answer. I'll remember that 32-32 64-64, it will be > easier for me to solve some problems. > > For multilib, I understand it'll be never done lfs. ok. I'm pleased with > knowing precisely this. It will help me to see my translation strategy > among complex lfs world :)
Never say never. It's my opinion that multilib, in general, is not needed for LFS. Others may (probably do) disagree. > Last question (still short): do you think it's useful (and will be done) > to build lfs from 32 to 64bits? Personally, no, I don't think it's useful in general. It is useful in specialized applications like building for an embedded device that doesn't have a compiler and other build support. However, I think that is beyond the scope of LFS. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
