On 4 August 2010 23:32, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: >> I had assumed I would for the moment just be updating *old* things, and >> that I could therefore note which LFS book version I had used in the commit >> message. Wrong! First up is libpng, which at the moment says - >> "This package is known to build and work properly using an LFS-6.5 >> platform." >> >> When I commit it, I'll comment that for the moment. Is it worth adding new >> entities, either for releases or for random LFS-svn versions ? > > I ran into the same thing with mysql. Perhaps we need something like: > > <!ENTITY lfssvn_checked "<para>This package is known to build and work > properly using an LFS-SVN-" > > <!ENTITY platform "platform.</para>"> > > > Then, in the page, > > &lfssvn_checked;20100804 &platform; > > Change the date as appropriate. > > -- Bruce > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > Mine were with LFS-6.6, my svn (+glibc-2.12.1, which causes minor damage in LFS) is still building. Seems fair enough, if there is no opposition I'll add these (3 variants) and the 6.6 variants when I get back to BLFS.
ĸen -- After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!" -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
