Randy McMurchy wrote: > Hi all, > > I went to build a new LFS (development version) today so that I could > begin getting BLFS ready for a release. I got bit in that my host's > kernel version (an old LFS build from 2007) was one release too short > (2.6.21.5 instead of 2.6.22.5). I've built 3 versions of LFS since this > host, but have wiped them out as they were never completed, thus I'm > using the old 2007 version as a host and have nothing newer. > > Anyway, I'll update the kernel. But I also noticed that my Glibc is 2.5 > and the requirement is 2.5.1. What exactly is going to fail if I continue > on with 2.5 instead of the 2.5.1 listed requirement?
It may not fail. We did run into a problem several months ago with someone using a very old LFS to build current, so I made a somewhat arbitrary update to the requirements to those packages that we in 6.0. That's a known good prereq. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
