----- Original Message ----- From: "David Jensen" <djensen...@windstream.net> To: <lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:01 PM Subject: Re: 6.16 gcc omit-frame pointer
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:38:06 -0600 > Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > David Jensen wrote: > > > > > The point of the thread is that the 'chapter 5 gcc pass 2' and the > > > 'chapter 6 gcc' instructions and explanations are inconsistent, > > > confusing and wrong for all but i?86. Maybe even completely > > > outdated. > > Right for the difference for non i?86 The chap5 gcc pass2 text say "For x86 machines, " but the instruction miss the case `uname -m` in i?86)esac that is present in chap6 The difference from i?86 and x86_64 is normal, that 's explained in http://www.mail-archive.com/lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org/msg02080.html I don't know if gcc-4.5 still behave that way. Gilles -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
