On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:04:03 -0400 "+Jan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Andrew Benton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > What would it take to compile a 64 bit system without the /lib > > => /lib64 symlink (i.e, with the libs installed into /lib and > > no /lib64)? Obviously, it works as it is, it just looks like an ugly > > hack. I'd much rather (for aesthetic reasons) do away with > > {/usr,}/lib64 if I could. > > > > > I did this on my last build of LFS a few months ago before my laptop's > charger decided to break down. It requires a fair bit of attention to make > sure your toolchain is built properly but once you get past GCC and Glibc > then most LFS packages build nicely. Any chance you could give me a clue how you got gcc to install into /usr/lib and not /usr/lib64? Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
