Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:26:54 -0500, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Matthew Burgess wrote: >>> Thanks for the reports guys. Would you mind running the following >> script >>> for me please and let me know what you get? On my builds, all 10 of the >>> no-patch builds produce the correct built-programs, and all 10 of the >>> patch builds produce the incorrect built-programs. >> I'm not sure what I'm looking for. Each pair of programs gives: >> >> --- built-programs-no-patch-10 2011-04-20 10:57:37.000000000 -0500 >> +++ built-programs-patch-10 2011-04-20 11:11:01.000000000 -0500 >> @@ -1 +1,4 @@ >> + cd .. && /bin/sh ./config.status src/Makefile depfiles >> +config.status: creating src/Makefile >> +config.status: executing depfiles commands >> [ base64 basename cat chcon chgrp chmod chown chroot cksum comm cp >> csplit cut date dd df dir dircolors dirname du echo env expand expr >> factor false fmt fold ginstall groups head hostid id join link ln >> logname ls md5sum mkdir mkfifo mknod mktemp mv nice nl nohup nproc od >> paste pathchk pinky pr printenv printf ptx pwd readlink rm rmdir runcon >> seq sha1sum sha224sum sha256sum sha384sum sha512sum shred shuf sleep >> sort split stat stdbuf stty sum sync tac tail tee test timeout touch tr >> true truncate tsort tty uname unexpand uniq unlink users vdir wc who >> whoami yes >> \ No newline at end of file > > Cool, so that has accurately triggered the bug. The problem is, that file > should only list the built programs, and those 3 lines at the top will > cause the 2 failures in the test suite. I think I'll raise this with > coreutils upstream, even though it's a patch they don't use. They're > clued up and should be able to tell me why the patch is causing the > build system to rebuild src/Makefile.
Because the patch changes Makefile.am? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
