On 05/18/2011 05:50 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > On 5/18/11 1:16 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: >> On 05/14/2011 11:12 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: >>> Attached patch is pretty invasive, 33 KB uncompressed. :-) I wasn't >>> sure whether to leave inittab in the book where it is currently, but I >>> am thinking from a packaging POV that it should remain as is and be >>> removed from the bootscripts tarball now. It was required in the >>> tarball previously because of the path changes. >>> >>> -- DJ Lucas >>> >> Alright, with last commit to lsb-bootscripts, I think we are ready to >> go. Bruce, Matt, you guys get a chance to review the patch? > What's virtel? (In etc/init.d/mountvirtfs) > > JH Results of a bad sed? I hadn't noticed that, only fixing the misspelling in the dependencies. Prior to that commit it was "kernel" when it was mountkernfs. Fixing.
Thanks. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
