Dan Nicholson wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: >> DJ Lucas wrote: >>> On 05/30/2011 12:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>>> In the latest svn, the bootscripts are lfs-bootscripts-20110424. >>>> >>>> I get an error: Â make[1]: /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd: Command not found >>>> >>>> This was identified a week ago by xinglp, but I don't see a fix. >>>> >>>> Â Â -- Bruce >>> Either need to roll back the inadvertent commit to the bootscripts >>> tarball job or move forward with the patch I sent in. Let me know if I >>> should do this. >> I'd appreciate it if you could do a revert. Â I took a look at the patch >> and it installs initd-tools as yet another package. Â I looked at the >> source to initd-tools and I don't understand why we need a C program to >> do that. Â It could be done in a shell script. That would require some >> effort to create, but would be much easier to maintain. >> >> Perhaps I can try writing the script after the middle of next month. Â We >> have a big deadline coming up. Â After that, Â I think I've earned about a >> year of comp time. > > Try writing as a shell script, Bruce. DJ did before and found that my > C version was much, much faster. Parsing the dependencies and building > a tree in an interpreted language with no data structures is a > nightmare. In C it's a linked list of structs. Just my opinion, > though.
I'll take a look and perhaps I'll come to the same conclusions. I'm not sure speed is the issue though. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
