----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Landley" <r...@landley.net> To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" <lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> Cc: "Bruce Dubbs" <bruce.du...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 5:54 AM Subject: Re: 6.8 patch tweaks.
... > > Ok, bug in busybox I should fix. Still, the patch doesn't need two > consecutive slashes in it triggering this bug in the current busybox > release version. > > > $ patch -Np1 -i ../procps-3.2.8-fix_HZ_errors-1.patch > > patching file proc/sysinfo.c > > $ ... > > it is not a high priority. You could edit the > > patch file manually or use a sed on it. > > Right now I'm just deleting it (hence the "rm" above). It isn't fixing > a bug I've actually hit, and if it was important it would presumably be > fixed in procps upstream. > That's fixed upstream in cvs but in a different way. Actual LFS HZ patch change old_Hertz_hack, but that part should not be used on modern kernel as name suggest. The real issue is that linux_version_code shoud be set. That highly depend on tools used to compile and if init_Linux_version run before or after init_libproc. Attached minimal patch was made with a cvs import to git and using git log -p, slightly manually changed because the NEWS change does not belong to the right changeset. There is other issues fixed in cvs tree (at least the forest_prefix warning) Full diff from 3.2.8 to cvs is what I resolved to use. This is available at http://ipcop.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ipcop/ipcop/trunk/src/patches/procps_cvs-2011-06-25.patch?view=log Gilles
procps-3.2.8_unknow-HZ.patch
Description: Binary data
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
