On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > Nathan Coulson wrote: >> Glibc-2.28.8 > > Typo? Current is 2-14. > >> I came across the problem in a self made SDL application, with the >> following stacktrace >> >> #0 0x00007f307280a0a9 in do_lookup_x () from /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 >> #13 0x00007f307171090c in SDL_Init (flags=48) at ./src/SDL.c:162 >> >> and in doing some research, looks like I am not the only person who >> got bit by this SDL (me) >> rpmbuild: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682307 > > Says that it is fixed in glibc-2.13.90-6 2011-03-12. I would think the > change is in 2.14. > >> gnucash: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682406 > DUPLICATE of bug 682307 > >> alsautils: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682415 > DUPLICATE of bug 682307 > >> warzone2100 (whatever that is): >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682398 > DUPLICATE of bug 682307 > >> from the above, I am guessing it's a problem with dlsym, and probably >> impacts anything that may dynamically load functions. > > What version of glibc are you using? > > -- Bruce
Got the list from the duplicates, was trying to get a sense of which programs it would impact. Using Glibc 2.14, latest LFS SVN as of 2 days ago. and doing a few more tests to isolate it... In my program SDL_Init was almost the first thing started, but when I put it in a simple test file, it never segfaulted. (Could possibly have been my fault) -- Nathan Coulson (conathan) ------ Location: British Columbia, Canada Timezone: PST (-8) Webpage: http://www.nathancoulson.com -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
