On Sep 2, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
> I didn't disregard the other work. I basically integrated the LSB
> scripts into the old scripts and made some new changes that I felt were
> needed
Then I'm glad you didn't disregard the work. I still disagree with backporting
changes like this when the LSB package existed and was complete. I don't get
the reason for duplicating the effort.
Again, what are the objections beyond initd_tools?
>>
> They do reflect the input from the work you and DJ did. The work of an
> editor is to take inputs from multiple sources and create a final
> product. I know you have been using the LSB bootscripts and I'm sorry
> that you don't like the route I took.
Please don't mistake my motivation here. It's not about what I'm doing. From a
personal standpoint, I really don't care what LFS does. I'm not using LFS now,
nor am I likely to in the future. It just bothered me that DJ spent so much
work to improve the scripts and then his work was not accepted for reasons that
are still unclear...
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
