>> Overall, I think this is stupid. These are library functions. Why are >> they in /etc instead of /lib. DJ, I know you are just describing things. >> >> -- Bruce > They are bash functions that are intended to make bash command > completion easier. LFS is fine without. I'll do something in the wiki or > in the BLFS profile page later on. It just bugs me that these were > 'standardized' to the Debian way. Do these functions exist outside of > Debian? Anybody got a RH or Cent box handy? As far as placement, the > logic is that they are part of a configuration file, and technically > they are I guess. Gray area? Anyway, all OT for this list now I guess. > > -- DJ Lucas
a BLFS page in chapter 3 would be the cleanest way to handle this, as we can get as detailed as we like without adding complexity to LFS. Unfortunately, this means that existing scripts which are installed during LFS will be broken... and not sure if I like the idea of a broken setup in LFS... -- Nathan Coulson (conathan) ------ Location: British Columbia, Canada Timezone: PST (-8) Webpage: http://www.nathancoulson.com -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
