Andrew Benton wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:23:59 -0600 > Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just a reminder that we did at one time adopt a patch naming convention: >> >> pkgname dash version dash short underscore descriptive underscore name >> dash patchrev3.patch >> >> That is, the name should be: >> >> thunderbird-9.0.1-libpng_1.5-1.patch >> >> not >> >> thunderbird-9.0.1-libpng-1.5-1.patch >> > > I don't agree with this. The patch is to fix thunderbird with > libpng-1.5, not libpng_1.5. It's not called libpng_1.5 so why should > the patch be called libpng_1.5?
I suppose we did this so we could do something like `ls | cut -d- -f3` or `ls | sort -k3 -t-` when working with a lot of patches. I don't really remember though. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
