Matt Burgess wrote: > On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 15:58 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Pierre Labastie wrote: >> >>> I have not tried to add /tools to a LIBRARY_PATH, because I am >>> (maybe wrongly) worried about linking to a libraries which are >>> then removed. >> I think that is a needless worry. gcc uses LIBRARY_PATH so it can get >> the linkages, but when running, the LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable and the >> ld.so.cache is used to find the library for running. >> >>>> We could also move xz to be before GRUB. >>> Not tried either, but this should work > > My preference would be to move xz to before GRUB. Ever since the > original work went in to splitting chapter 5 and chapter 6 up, we've > tried to keep things in chapter 6 from linking to anything in /tools if > at all possible. I realise that in this case, it shouldn't make a > difference, as GRUB isn't actually invoked until chapter 8, at which > point chapter 6's xz is obviously available, but it just doesn't sit > right with me that we're going to be explicitly trying to get it to > build against something in /tools.
OK, I was just trying to provide alternatives. Switching the order is pretty trivial. Be sure to update the dependencies. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
