On 2/27/12 11:10 PM, Bryan Kadzban wrote: > https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:ms_KKFndiCkJ:www.x86-64.org/documentation/abi.pdf+linux+abi+64-bit+x86&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShHjrdWF0azVfQCEu-s8nYZAzhXt5X9e2WZeIC7fqrwtyLFFUztVtpzfZo3ucJZB49pJHfDqqZL90ngzTG4BBheeJgy22Dj8RY9P0AjWbbKcXPzrvlKdn1S3W-CRCjpyqevNL6m&sig=AHIEtbS5MYc65tgRT4svuwi7uO7iAzNZyQ > > Specifically, section 5.2.1.
Ah, yes, thanks, I should have remembered this as I had encountered it a while ago. Recently, I have been playing around with other libc implementations and got a little trigger happy with install locations. I can revert this part. > ...Or just leave lib64 around. Yes, I actually think multilib on x86_64 is the better way (and it's not really hard at all, just two additional builds of glibc in 32-bit mode - no other 32-bit libs are really necessary for a multilib implementation). But I wasn't going to suggest that all at once. Thanks for the cluebat - I'll revert the 64-bit stuff and regen the diff. JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
