Pierre Labastie wrote: > Le 18/03/2012 23:56, Bryan Kadzban a écrit : >>> I am not sure I fully understand this story of relocation data... >>> >> I'd have to guess different flags sent to the linker. As for *why* >> those flags are being sent differently... no idea yet. :-) I >> should get some hardware and start rebuilding to poke into this. > Thanks for your interest. > > Well, that could also be something coming from the way ICA is done. > Those files (grub modules and .oS files) are stripped from all > symbols, while, being kind of libraries, they should keep the > relocation data.
But the strip process shouldn't *move* the relocation section, I wouldn't think? > So isn't it that strip somehow did different things to each > directories? > > I've done another try without any stripping (but then, I had to > change the ICA scripts, and I have not had time to fully test them). > It seems that all the differences I pointed out are gone. It remains > only the differences in .la files and in libgmpxx.so (and time stamps > of course) . That's weird. There are no differences in the strip binaries (when you do strip the libraries), right? Or in libbfd.so.whatever-it-is?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
