On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:18:27AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On svn-20040419 x86_64, with static libraries mostly suppressed, I > saw failures in
> gcc - > 3 unexpected failures in libitm, but none were specifically listed Correction : that was 3 *expected* failures - I can't read :) With 20120425, similar results throughout (I didn't bother to check that the *same* numbers of tests were skipped). This time, running linux-3.3.3 instead of 3.3.2. From here, the explanations for the changes look good (and explain some things that are generally not well known), and my test results are no worse, so congratulations to both Jeremy and Bruce for doing this. Actually, I do agree with James that this might be enough of a change to bump the major version when we release. But they're only numbers, I wouldn't be upset if our last release had been 6.10. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
