On 05/25/2012 07:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > As of right now, we have > > 344 packages marked with lfs70_checked > 274 packages marked with lfs71_checked > 0 packages marked with lfs6?_checked > > There is one package not marked that I know of, icedtea, and that is > being worked. > > There are 15 open tickets. Two are new apps, 11 are upgrades to > existing packages (including icedtea). Two tickets do not involve > package upgrades. > > -- Bruce
Wow, I did not even know that BLFS has that many packages. Also, I'd like to use this to ask for something. In LFS and BLFS we use package-package-version for docdir, eg /usr/share/doc/attr-2.4.46. Why? I mean, it is somehow stupid if you ask me. If you keep your system arround for some time, and upgrade such packages, you will have dozen of versioned directories in there. But that's not all. There are lot of packages that just install their documentation in non-versioned directory, especially Xorg stuff. So in the end, we have half of packages with versioned docdir and half with non-versioned. So, which one to keep? Which one would suit us better? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
