On 6/6/12 7:27 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > 1. It may encourage the people who are resurrecting the "drop > autotools from LFS" suggestion :)
Too late, I'm already encouraged! :P Seriously though, I really didn't intend to bring up that discussion again. I only wanted to get rid of popt. :) But that may be a futile endeavor too... (Major tangent now) My main motive for wanting to keep a very lightweight base system isn't so much size on disk as image size (a complete base system image). This is a somewhat important consideration if you want to be easily transferring / duplicating / manipulating virtual machines. But that's all stuff I can achieve outside of LFS so there's no real need for me to encourage LFS proper to do the same, although I wouldn't mind if it did that either. :D JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
