On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:34:23PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:46:51AM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 08:40:39 -0500, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Armin K. wrote: > > >> For those of you not following systemd-devel mailing list, here are some > > >> responses from Lennart regarding systemd and udev split. > > > > > > I figured we'd get that type of response, if any at all. > > > > Given the noises upstream were making when they originally announced the > > systemd/udev source merge about the ability to still build and install udev > > standalone this did somewhat surprise me. Maybe I was just too optimistic > > or naive? :-( > > > IMHO, naive.
As usual, I have a talent for sometimes expressing myself *too* directly - that wasn't intended to be offensive or insulting, but could easily be taken that way. If anyone did read it like that, I apologise to Matt : feel free to call me a [ anglo-saxon word ]. To me, the way systemd swallowed udevd is a classic example of distro politics, together with a strong helping of "my way or the highway". In future, I'll try to be my normal long-winded consider-all-options self when I post here :) ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
