On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 01:10 +0100, Armin K. wrote: > Well, I am trying to keep LFS and LFS Systemd as close as possible - > that's all. In that case, we would just need to change ENABLE_LOG=0 in > init-functioins for systemd branch.
OK then, at least I understood it correctly :-) The patch is fine for trunk. For the systemd branch, feel free to re-create the bootscripts directory and pop the patched init-functions back in there. You may want to bring make-aux-files.sh and aux-files-data.sh back across to that branch as well, and the relevant Makefile snippets that trigger the bootscripts tarball build. Going back to the ifup/ifdown thing, feel free to commit those back to the systemd branch as well. As for the ifupdown@.service unit, have distros standardized on that? I'd prefer to call it something like ifctl@.service, if possible. It just feels more correct to say: systemd disable ifctl@eth0 Saying 'systemd disable ifupdown@eth0' seems confusing as you've got the word up alongside the words disable and down. In addition, you've got both 'disable' and 'down' there, duplicating the action to take. That said, I'd prefer consistency with existing distros direction on this than getting correct according to my taste. Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
