On Sun, 2013-10-13 at 11:44 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I have been working with make-4, tar-1.27, and util-linux-2.24-rc2. > Make and tar are fine, but util-linux has some major problems with the > install phase.
I tested tar a while back too and had no issues, but I saw your comment (2) on #3409 so decided to hold back. My understanding is that the ACL code is new, so any bugs in it aren't regressions (see NEWS referenced in the release announcement at http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2013-10/msg00002.html. The reported bug concerning sparse file handling suggests it's a long known bug too: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2013-10/msg00006.html As such, I'm happy to get the updated version into LFS. Thanks to you and Ken for testing make-4.0; I'll take that one too. > I've reported the util-linux problem upstream. Ta! Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
