>On 01/15/14, Bruce Dubbs<bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>John Burrell wrote:
>>>
>>> I found out that util-linux and udev have a circular dependency.
>>> What we do now is OK, but there are some things disabled. What we
>>> need to do is add util-linux-pass2 after udev.
>>>
>>> What I'm thinking about doing is move the current full install to
>>> be after udev and replace the current page with only:
>>>
>>> ./configure make make install
>>>
>>> The tests can be done in the 2nd pass and adjustment of the path
>>> to adjtime is only in the man pages, rtcwake, and hwclock. All
>>> these would be updated after the 2nd install.
>>>
>>> Does this seem like a reasonable approach?
>>>
>>
>> I recently reinstalled util-linux and noticed that su gets installed
>> from util-linux.
>>
>> So the way LFS is now, su comes from shadow. If you reinstall, I
>> expect that su will come from util-linux. The caveat here is that I
>> installed systemd, so I don't know if su comes from util-linux only
>> if systemd is installed. I didn't test that.
>>
>> Anyway, I recommend that if you change the way util-linux is
>> installed, you test which su you end up with.
>
>Redirecting to lfs-dev. Sending to blfs was a typo.
>
>Thanks John, I'll check that.
>
>>>
>>> I found out that util-linux and udev have a circular dependency.
>>> What we do now is OK, but there are some things disabled. What we
>>> need to do is add util-linux-pass2 after udev.
>>>
>>> What I'm thinking about doing is move the current full install to
>>> be after udev and replace the current page with only:
>>>
>>> ./configure make make install
>>>
>>> The tests can be done in the 2nd pass and adjustment of the path
>>> to adjtime is only in the man pages, rtcwake, and hwclock. All
>>> these would be updated after the 2nd install.
>>>
>>> Does this seem like a reasonable approach?
>>>
>>
>> I recently reinstalled util-linux and noticed that su gets installed
>> from util-linux.
>>
>> So the way LFS is now, su comes from shadow. If you reinstall, I
>> expect that su will come from util-linux. The caveat here is that I
>> installed systemd, so I don't know if su comes from util-linux only
>> if systemd is installed. I didn't test that.
>>
>> Anyway, I recommend that if you change the way util-linux is
>> installed, you test which su you end up with.
>
>Redirecting to lfs-dev. Sending to blfs was a typo.
>
>Thanks John, I'll check that.
>
>-- Bruce
Hi all,
Hi all,
I thought that su was removed entirely from util-linux.
Regards,
-Drew Ames
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
