Pierre Labastie <pierre.labastie <at> neuf.fr> writes:

> 
> But I am worried about this new output for 32 bit build. Doesn't it mean
> we should have a symlink lib32->lib, as we have lib64->lib for 64 bit?
> How many packages do rely on having libs in lib32 rather than lib?
> 
> Pierre
> 

No lib32 folder was ever created anywhere in the 7.5-rc1 system being built
when that GCC check result was observed.

Arthur


-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to