Gregory H. Nietsky wrote:
>
> Ok actually reading the book again .... in "iii. LFS Target
> Architectures"
>
> You welcome to add ARMv7l to the list same rules apply as PPC infact
> ARM is "easier" and mostly out the box.

OK, I'll add that.

  a disclaimer is that i build
> it mostly cross with qemu-user running it this way on a i7x8 is
> faster than a exynos5 but i have built a functional system natively
> QT4 takes good few hours and icedtea even longer. a raspberry PI is
> a "lower" spec system that it should work on may need extra switches
> to operate with its FPU.
>
> also x32 is a posiblity to run 32bit ILP (int,long,ptr) with 4GB
> memory limit per process allowing 32bit addressing using 64bit
> instructions/registers this is for embeded systems with limited
> memory. binaries are smaller memory footprint is lower but higher
> than 32bit.
>
> KIDS DO NOT TRY x32 @ home its not 100% friendly LFS works fine but
> to bootstrap it you MUST CROSS build from 64bit and its not pretty.
> once its up and going works fine. BLFS will mostly work, ASM will
> need tweeks/disable QT4 can be tortured to build i have patched
> mplayer to work but without  the "optimizations" its a nice way to
> juice a intel atom as a "server". Also the kernel must be 64bit with
> x32 support. Some things just dont work for one ADA builds fine with
> some bodgery but time functions are b0rk3d system uses 64bit and ada
> 32bit i have got icedtea to build on it for "educational" purposes
> only as it runs with the "zero" hotspot only. i strongly recommend
> using a multilib system with at least x32/64 bit support and use
> 64bit versions of programs which x32 does not provide this adds hard
> drive bloat and likely reverses all gains on low memory footprint as
> you will run 2 versions of DLL's in memory in many cases.

You might consider writing a hint.

http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/howtowrite.html

   -- Bruce

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to