From: "Armin K." <kre...@email.com> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] udev, eudev, mdev Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 17:09:16 +0100
> On 03/04/2014 04:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> I've been working on udev and have got it to build with the systemd-210 >> source. The problem is that it is getting more and more intertwined >> with the rest of systemd requiring things that don't seem to be applicable. >> >> For instance, >> >> filea.c requires a function from >> fileb.c which requires a function from >> filec.c. >> >> The problem is that filea really doesn't require anything from filec, >> but the build process doesn't like unresolved references. >> >> My question is whether we need to try either eudev or mdev. Does anyone >> have any experience with eudev or mdev? >> >> I note that the latest eudev is dated today. >> >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~blueness/eudev/ >> >> -- Bruce >> > > eudev is rather the udev from pre-systemd merge with all the latest > fixes pulled from systemd tree. > > Note sure, but I think mdev is something else and not really compatible > with original udev. eudev seems to be the best solution for (B)LFS. You probably alredy know that clfs uses eudev. I am personnaly running a clfs 2.1.0 multilib 64-32 and eudev seems to work perfectly. Since an lfs is very close to a clfs (before this clfs I installed 2 or 3 lfs version so I may consider that I know these system quite well.) I might predict that eudev will work on an lfs. Regards Pierre > > -- > Note: My last name is not Krejzi. > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ > Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
