> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 16:19:41 +0100 > From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [lfs-dev] kernel options after removing systemd > > I'm just catching up on the details of what has changed. In > section 8.3 the rationale entries for all mentioned options are now > present - so far, so good. > > Unfortunately, automounter version 4 support is still shown as an > item to be selected. It was certainly recommended for systemd, but > the last part of the rationale "this is needed to work around a bug > with network filesystems which are to be mounted on boot" ONLY > applied to systemd. > > IMHO we should not include the kernel automounter in LFS. BLFS > already has that setting on its autofs page. >
What _method_ is being used to revert the sysd changes; it instead seems to be happening in a very piecemeal debris-strewn wander. Although "it's a development branch", the work _was_ done such that one can still at the very least be able to back-out changes cleanly, right? You _can_ take the clean set of diffs since last pre-sysd version, and cherry-pick and apply the relevant set readily, to fast-forward to get latest non-sysd, right? (This of course is in the absence of simply doing it right first time around via proper basic best-practice use of rcs branchings.) rgds, akh > ??en > -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
