On 18/06/2014 16:05, Kazer Powa wrote:
Yep, I've read that, and I still believe it is wrong. It's not about the
ls command, it's about the path of the target. Of course the command in
the section 4.2 is right, as well as this one, but this one's target
path is wrong.
Please don't top-post.
The command is *not* wrong. The symlink's target is relative to its
source, not to its current working directory.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
