Le 30/10/2014 15:45, David Brodie a écrit : > On 29/10/14 22:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Pierre Labastie wrote: >>> >>> The version checks in jhalfs are fragile, because they depend on an >>> expected >>> behavior or the excutable. Actually, the tested version of wget is 1.0.0, >>> which does not exist, but is lower than any known version: the aim is >>> just to >>> test wget presence. Any version will do. >>> >>> Of course, if Suse strips the version number, this does not work. I >>> guess you >>> can answer c<ret> if you are sure that you have wget. But I agree it >>> is annoying. >>> >>> I'll try a VM machine with Suse tomorrow (which version actually?) >> >> I believe it was openSUSE-12.3-KDE-Live-x86_64.iso. >> > > Curious, I've just run up openSUSE-13.1 x86-64, which was *installed* from a > live CD, and wget --version gives: > > GNU Wget 1.14 build on linux-gnu. >
I can confirm that "wget --version" from the 12.3 live CD strips the version part... Installing now. End of installation: It is the same on an installed (from live CD) system. I tried to desinstall and reinstall wget: still strips the version part. Looks like a bug in this version of SUSE? Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
