On 01/29/2015 01:23 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > I've started on a build, with current LFS plus a few variations > (bison-3.0.4, libtool-2.4.5, patch-2.7.3, linux-3.19-rc6 headers) > and I've also changed my build to untar and compile in a tmpfs - > does not seem to make any significant difference to the build times I > can compare, but perhaps the untarring and rm -rf is faster. > > Anyway, I mention the tmpfs because attr's testsuite failed - you > can't have extended attributes in tmpfs - and it is possible that > the new gcc failures are related to this, or, of course, to the > newer kernel headers. >
You can have both Extended Attributes and Access Control Labels on a tmpfs. See CONFIG_TMPFS_XATTR and CONFIG_TMPFS_POSIX_ACL > I'm seeing errors, beyond those I expected to see, in the testsuites > for: > > gcc: 125 unexpected failures in g++, 658 in gcc, 22 in libstdc++ > instead of the usual handful of failures. The last time I saw those > sorts of numbers was a little while before my AmigaOne expired. > > perl: unexpected error number in getnameinfo.t, invalid argument in > io_multihomed.t and io_sock.t : I think I've seen something like > that in the last few months, but I thought it had gone away (didn't > run any tests on real hardware for my previous build, and the logs > from the i686 VM tests are in qemu images). > > This is _intended_ to be a full build of the desktop packages I > care about, to be followed by some server and other things in a VM. > > So, maybe nothing to worry about :) > > ĸen > -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
