On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 12:04:31PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Pierre Labastie wrote: > >Le 04/02/2015 03:04, Ken Moffat a écrit : > >> > >> So, what am I missing ? In general, people do not complain that > >>their output at this point does not match (i.e. exceeds) what the > >>book suggests. > >> > >Seems there is an oscillating behaviour of the results as a function of > >binutils version > >number: see > >http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2013-April/067945.html > >
You have a good memory! I did not realise the output differs according to the version of binutils. > The point of the test is to ensure that /tools/lib and /tools/usr/lib are > NOT present. Perhaps we should just say that. > > -- Bruce That sounds good. ĸen -- Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady. Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
