On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 12:01:39AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > My _impression_ from my recent experience is that site_perl trumps > whatever is installed by the core (e.g. biber wanted an *older* > version of a core module for speed efficiencie - on one box, I tried > that, from memory it went into site_perl and got used in preference > to the module from the core (it made biber's testsuite noticeably). noticeably *faster* > > As to /usr and /usr/local - if a distro provides binary updates, > /usr/local may help to keep your own things unaltered. For a linux > system, /usr/local is rarely worth the aggravation¹ - and I suspect > that perl's vendor directory is similar. For an LFS system
ĸen -- This one goes up to eleven! -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
