On 11.07.2015 11:44, James Powell wrote:
> I'm not saying you, nor I could have said anything to change their minds, but 
> now I'm curious and concerned about the direction of the project.
> 
> Without controlled stable releases, how will they track bugs? Just say to 
> everyone, pull a new git clone and pray it works?
> 
> Very strange indeed, and thanks for keeping us informed Armin.
> 

Don't top post, it's hard to properly reply and to keep track of the
conversation at the same time.

I don't think there was ever a stable release, just a new release.
Every new release introduces a lots of features and bugs alike, so
I can't really agree that they ever released stable releases.

There were stable branches, where they declared a certain version
for "stable updates", where fixes were backported but new features
were not.

In the end, nothing was changed except the distribution ready
tarballs not being generated anymore.

-- 
Note: My last name is not Krejzi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to