> >Ref: Linux From Scratch - Version SVN-20151025 > > > >Does a patch exist to enable everything to be compiled to /lib, > >/usr/lib rather than /lib64, /usr/lib64 on an x86_64 machine? > > > >The last time I built LFS I managed to do it, but it took a significant > >amount of hacking to get there (and I lost my notes). > > > Is there a need for? > Either build x64 to /[usr/]lib and then 32bit packages to /[usr/]lib32 or > build x64 packages to /[usr/]lib64. > Because using /lib and /usr/lib for different architectures is dangerous and > can lead to link problems. > Thanks for the reply.
If I'm building a pure 64-bit system, I don't see the problem in compiling to /lib and /usr/lib. The need, if you can call it that, is that only glibc and gcc want to compile to /lib64 and /usr/lib64 respectively and just about everything else will compile to /usr/lib without the need to add additional ./configure switches. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
