On 1/16/2016 4:34 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
However, the test suite failure should be mentioned, or test excluded.
Ahh, no need now! :-) Their git diff wouldn't apply. There were some
extra blobs that weren't in ours -- probably changed after ours was
generated. Anyway, pulled all three i18n patches, applied and tested.
They apply with some offset, so I rediffed against clean source. Test
results look good:
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for GNU coreutils 8.25
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 30
# PASS: 23
# SKIP: 7
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 0
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for GNU coreutils 8.25
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 308
# PASS: 296
# SKIP: 12
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 0
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
I'm also curious about the warning we give in the book. Any recent
reports of problems caused by this patch? All I could find was sort in
2009 (in our own archives). There were 4 security issues with it back in
2013.
--DJ
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
