On 2/19/2016 3:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I've built the new glibc in my sandbox and will start doing a -rc2 when
my full build completes in the next hour or so.
I did look at the test failures:
XPASS: elf/tst-protected1a
XPASS: elf/tst-protected1b
FAIL: posix/tst-getaddrinfo4
FAIL: posix/tst-getaddrinfo5
None of the stuff from the tarball in 418 has been added. Next release.
Summary of test results:
2 FAIL
2401 PASS
84 XFAIL
2 XPASS
I've updated the text to add posix/tst-getaddrinfo5 to the list of known
failures. When I look at the text we have now, I also see:
* The rt/tst-cputimer1 and rt/tst-cpuclock2 tests have been known to
fail. The reason is not completely understood, but indications are that
minor timing issues can trigger these failures.
I think I had still seen one of the mentioned tests when building on
single processor in KVM, but don't recall which. I'll get a build on KVM
before release day.
* The math tests sometimes fail when running on systems where the CPU is
not a relatively new Intel or AMD processor.
* Other tests known to fail on some architectures are
malloc/tst-malloc-usable and nptl/tst-cleanupx4.
I have already removed the text about tst-protected1{a,b}.
I have not seen any of these in a long time. Should I remove them?
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
