On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 03:46:50PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Pierre Labastie wrote: > >> > >>It would be interesting if you could try a jhalfs build to see it that also > >>has a problem at the same place.
I'm not setup for jhalfs. When I can get back to this I plan to retry make install-libs manually in chroot under fedora, to see if I can capture exactly what fails (segfault, I think). > >> > >>I could get a Fedora iso and try it in a gemu session. Do you want me to do > >>that? > > >I have a VM with Fedora 21. Is it expected to give the same issue? > > > >If so, I can test build with jhalfs. > > I don't know if Fedora 21 gives the problem or not. I think I've had > students use that successfully, but Fedora 23 is the one that gave Ken a > problem. > > -- Bruce > I'm fairly sure we've also had people on the support lists using Centos (older than f23, but still a fedora/redhat variant) without unfixable problems. For the issues at linuxquestions, google found one or two examples of missing host requirements, one failed attempt in what was then the previous fedora release (19, I think) and perhaps related to a problem with the gcc version in tht release, and then the blanket warning: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-from-scratch-13/%5Bcontributed-notice%5D-using-fedora-to-build-lfs-not-advised-4175485207/ Reading that showed that somebody then managed to build using F19. He or she had doubts about the reported selinux errors (in toolchain tests, apparently - that probably fits where I got them), but the end result seemed to be ok. Google did not find any other specific problem reports, only people saying "do not use fedora as the host". ĸen -- This email was written using 100% recycled letters. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
