Douglas R. Reno wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
Correct, this was resolved in SVN a couple of weeks ago. Should only
affect 231 and 232.
For someone who does not use systemd (me), all this sounds terribly
complex. Why not pass --disable-resolved to systemd and just use the
resolver in glibc?
Alternatively, there is unbound or bind in BLFS that can provide a caching
name server in a straightforward (one task, one application) way.
-- Bruce
Bruce, are you top posting? (or did DJ top post?) ;-)
I was responding to DJ.
Anyway, I think we have to give up networkd if we do that, which will
require network connectivity to be handled by yet another layer, which
seems way more complicated to me than just keeping networkd. We'd have to
provide links to something like NetworkManager.
I wasn't really suggesting a change. It was just a snide comment about
how systemd is the antithesis of Unix. Complexity that replaces
simplicity for no real benefit to the user.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
