> From: Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 16:10:27 -0600 > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] [lfs-dev] nosym branches > . . > I think we can probably put this in trunk as it is simpler than the > symlinks we have now and will avoid all those 'seems to be moved' warnings. > > I'm also thinking that this may be a big enough conceptual change (it's > not really a dramatic change in instructions) to make this LFS 8.0. If we > do that, we should probably do it now so we have a lot of experience with > it when we do the final tests for a March release. > > What do you think? >
From the point of view of the earlier posts from here (incl refs, re versioning) to earlier discussion on version-bumps: I'd say that there is enough of an ~api change, to warrant a new major version. (This is as distinct from any number of spurious 'reasons'. And, it helps keep b/lfs version numbers having a meaning.) akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
