DJ Lucas wrote:
On 12/17/2016 11:37 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Pierre Labastie wrote:
On 17/12/2016 17:22, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 12/17/2016 03:18 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
On 17/12/2016 07:46, [email protected] wrote:
Author: dj
Date: Fri Dec 16 22:46:18 2016
New Revision: 11154
Merge nosym branch.
[...]
There is a note in "6.10. Adjusting the Toolchain", telling:
"On 64-bit systems, the path above will be
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.2.0/../../../../lib64/. This reduces
to /usr/lib64 and /usr/lib64 is a symlink that points to /usr/lib."
Hopefully, this is no more true. I haven't built with the new layout
yet, so I am not sure how what should be changed, or whether the note
should remain, sorry for not proposing a fix.
Actually, what I have on a 64-bit build with jhalfs is:
/usr/lib/../lib/crt1.o succeeded
/usr/lib/../lib/crti.o succeeded
/usr/lib/../lib/crtn.o succeeded
I am not sure we should keep the note...
I agree that the note should be removed.
Actually, we have in the book /usr/lib/crt?.o. I'm thinking since we are
already adding the note about x86 not being regularly tested by the
editors, we should start using the 64-bit values. Any reason not to add
the extra path elements and showing explicit x86_64 output in the book
with the notes applying to x86 changes?
I think that is a good idea.
Also in Chapter 6, gcc we have:
"Depending on your machine architecture, the above may differ slightly,
the difference usually being the name of the directory after
/usr/lib/gcc. The important thing to look for here is that gcc has found
all three crt*.o files under the /usr/lib directory"
What I have is:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.2.0/../../../../lib/crt1.o succeeded
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.2.0/../../../../lib/crti.o succeeded
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.2.0/../../../../lib/crtn.o succeeded
so that paragraph *may* need to be revised or removed.
It looks correct to me. Again x86_64 values in the book?
Also later in the same chapter:
"The output of the last command (allowing for a lib64 directory on
64-bit hosts) should be:
attempt to open /lib/libc.so.6 succeeded"
so the parenthetical remark needs to be removed.
Yes, it appears I had lost some of those textual changes when moving away
from the first take (which broke spec).
There may be other places. grep in /jhalfs/logs for lib64.
Yes, I plan to go through it with a fine toothed comb now.
Thanks for all of this.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
