Hello,
I've (re)read carefully the beginning of LFS and I've found these things.
http://linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/systemd/prologue/standards.html
Packages supplied by LFS needed to satisfy the LSB Requirements
LSB Core: [...], GTK+2, [...]
There are no gtk libs in LFS isn't it ?
(the patch does not add gtk2+ in BLFS LSB requirements )
http://linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/systemd/prologue/package-choices.html
Systemd
[...] In LFS it is installed side-by-side with Sysvinit to provide the user
with alternative boot systems for comparison.
I think it's no longer correct.
Amaury Jacques
Index: prologue/why.xml
===================================================================
--- prologue/why.xml (révision 11179)
+++ prologue/why.xml (copie de travail)
@@ -479,8 +479,7 @@
<para>This package provides and <application>init</application> program
and several additional boot and system control capabilities as an
alternative to Sysvinit. It is used by many commercial distributions.
- In LFS it is installed side-by-side with Sysvinit to provide the user with
- alternative boot systems for comparison.</para>
+ </para>
</listitem>
<listitem revision="sysv">
Index: prologue/standards.xml
===================================================================
--- prologue/standards.xml (révision 11179)
+++ prologue/standards.xml (copie de travail)
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
<term><emphasis>LSB Core:</emphasis></term>
<listitem>
<para>Bash, Bc, Binutils, Coreutils, Diffutils, File, Findutils, Gawk,
- Grep, GTK+2, Gzip, M4, Man-DB, Ncurses, Procps, Psmisc, Sed,
+ Grep, Gzip, M4, Man-DB, Ncurses, Procps, Psmisc, Sed,
Shadow, Tar, Util-linux, Zlib</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
